
Signal
Start with an alert or behaviour worth examining. Scout brings the relevant activity into focus so an analyst can decide what deserves a closer look.

Start with an alert or behaviour worth examining. Scout brings the relevant activity into focus so an analyst can decide what deserves a closer look.

Connect on-chain flows with customer information and relevant evidence. See the relationships around an event before interpreting what it means.

Follow every claim back to its source. Keep the evidence and its origin directly connected so a reviewer can inspect the basis for each conclusion.

Distinguish what is known from what is inferred. Keep unresolved questions visible, so confidence reflects the evidence and gaps remain clear.

Build a case narrative that a human reviewer can follow. Link observations, evidence and reasoning into a clear path from the first alert to the final decision.
Scout flags an unusual 48,500 USDC transfer to a new destination. This starts an investigation, not a conclusion.

New destination · Unusual amount
24k + 16k + 8.5k USDC
Profile + 90 days of activity
Linked evidence · Open question
Analyst makes the final decision
Scout starts with the observable facts: 48,500 USDC sent to a new destination. The transaction record shows the amount and addresses, while the purpose remains unconfirmed.
PREPARED FOR HUMAN REVIEW
48,500 USDC was sent to a new destination, followed by three onward transfers. The amount exceeds the customer’s typical activity. Source-of-funds information is still needed.
FINDINGS & OPEN QUESTIONS
THE SUPPORTING RECORD
The recorded movement anchors the case. Amount and destination are observations that can be checked directly.
A transfer occurred to a new destination. This record alone does not establish its purpose or intent.
Scout compares the transfer with the activity available for this customer, keeping the observation window visible.
The amount is outside the observed range. Unusual size warrants a closer look; it does not determine whether the transfer is legitimate.
Three onward movements follow the initial transfer. Each amount stays linked to its destination in the case.
The records show where the funds moved next. They do not, by themselves, identify who controls the receiving addresses.
There is no supporting source-of-funds record attached to this example. Scout keeps the missing information visible.
Does this transfer match the customer’s stated source of funds? The question remains open until sufficient evidence is available.
Scout makes the path to a decision easier to inspect. The analyst verifies the evidence, decides what it means and leaves a record another person can understand.
Review the transaction, history and linked movements. Scout keeps direct observations beside the missing information, so the evidence has a clear boundary.
Use the record, policy and relevant customer context to determine the next step. Scout supports the reasoning; it does not decide the outcome.
Record the evidence considered, the unresolved questions and the final assessment in one traceable case narrative for the next reviewer.